Annual Faculty Evaluations

Interfolio Login

2021 annual evaluations will be completed in Interfolio. Interfolio is a faculty activities reporting software used widely throughout higher education that accommodates faculty evaluation and promotion and tenure reviews. The information entered will be both accessible and cumulative over time. For supervisors and reviewers, this format simplifies the review process and signatory workflow, eliminating the need for exchanging paper and applying signatures in ink.

Interfolio replaces Digital Measures for academic faculty, allowing members to build promotion and tenure packages by documenting role-related accomplishments (teaching, research, service) throughout the year. The self-evaluation portion of the annual evaluation is completed within Interfolio.

Interfolio allows administrative faculty members to prepare their self-evaluation, supervisors to provide input, and provides an automated review and approval routing process.

Training Materials and Support

Academic Faculty

Administrative Faculty

Proposals and Awards

Faculty users can now click the "manage status" button to change the status of a proposal or award, regardless of its source. Faculty are encouraged to pay particular attention to the "status" field as they work on evaluations.

Course Evaluations

Due to an unforeseen emergency, quantitative evaluation results will not be completely uploaded into faculty Interfolio accounts until January 15. As a result, for 2021 annual evaluations, teaching evaluations will need to be shared with committees, chairs, et al. in the manner that you have used in the past, or faculty can upload PDFs of their evaluations from unr.edu/evaluate into their annual packet.

Required 2021 Annual Evaluation Documents

Academic Faculty

  1. Evaluation Narrative completed within Interfolio Activities
  2. Evaluation period: Spring 2021 through Fall 2021
  3. Role Statements: Current Role Statement (2021) and New Role Statement (2022) – see examples
  4. Role Statement template
  5. CV updated through December 2021
  6. Teaching evaluations (if applicable)

Administrative Faculty

  1. Evaluation Narrative completed in Interfolio Activities
    • Evaluation period: Spring 2021 through Fall 2021
  2. Goal Statements: Current Goal Statement (2021) and New Goal Statement (2022) Administrative Faculty Goal Statement Form Download

Supervisors

Merit ratings must be provided within Interfolio and entered on the Merit Spreadsheet. Once complete, email the merit spreadsheet to Debra Glogovac and Tiffany Hoffman.

Excellent Rating

Met the requirements of ‘Commendable’, plus:

  • Significantly surpasses expectations in all aspects of position/responsibilities; and
  • Demonstrates highest knowledge and skills.

Commendable Rating

Met the requirements of ‘Satisfactory’, plus:

  • Successfully met, and in some areas, significantly exceeded established goals and objectives.

Satisfactory Rating

Met the established goals and objectives for the evaluation period, plus:

  • In a few instances, may have missed some or exceeded others, but on balance performs competently.

Unsatisfactory Rating

Did not meet established goals and objectives for the evaluation period, plus:

  • Has not performed competently or consistently; and/or
  • Has not experienced productivity and competence in one or more categories that were applicable.

Visit the NSHE Website

Evaluation Score and Merit Ratings

Merit ratings must be provided within Interfolio, and also entered on the Merit Spreadsheet emailed to each chair/director. Once completed, email the merit spreadsheet to the Office for Faculty, Debra Glogovac, dglogovac@med.unr.edu.

Excellent

Met the requirements of ‘Commendable’, plus:

  • Significantly surpasses expectations in all
    aspects of position/responsibilities; and
  • Demonstrates highest knowledge and skills.

Commendable

Met the requirements of ‘Satisfactory’, plus:

  • Successfully met, and in some areas, significantly exceeded established goals and objectives.

Satisfactory

Met the established goals and objectives for the evaluation period, plus:

  • In a few instances, may have missed some or exceeded others, but on balance performs competently.

Unsatisfactory

Did not meet established goals and objectives for the evaluation period, plus:

  • Has not performed competently or consistently; and/or
  • Has not experienced productivity and competence in one or more categories that were applicable.